"Go Back to Where You Are" at Playwrights Horizons, April 10, 2011
David Greenspan returns to off-Broadway with a new play at Playwrights Horizons. It seems to be a combination of The Sound and the Fury, Lips Together, Teeth Apart, and Title of Show.
Bernard (Brian Hutchison), a high school English teacher and erstwhile playwright, is off to visit his enormously-successful-and-grand-Broadway-actress-sister Claire (Lisa Banes) at her Hamptons manse, not far from the small family cabin in which he weekends. Along for the weekend are her friend, less-successful-actress Charlotte (Mariann Mayberry), Tom (Stephen Bogardus), Claire's frequent director, his partner Malcolm (Tim Hopper) and Claire's son Wally (Michael Izqueirdo). An early prologue introduces Passalus (Mr. Greenspan), a Greek chorus boy, trapped between worlds as God's minion longing for an end to the errands and chores of the Almighty. God wants Passalus to help Carolyn along in her life, escaping the thumb of Claire, her mother.
(Spoiler Alert)
Passalus strikes a bargain with God that if he completes his task, and only that task, God will send him along to the afterlife.
Easier said than done.
Holding Passalus back is an interminable need to "fix" everything he encounters, and Claire's little weekend party is rife with opportunity. Claire still mourns her husband Robert's death. Wally still mourns his partner Mark's death. Bernard still mourns his partner Patrick's death. Charlotte still mourns her failing career. Malcolm mourns his dying relationship with Tom. (lots of death for a comedy)
Performances are rather uneven. Mr. Hutchison's nervous playwright works for the expository monologues, but falls short in the more emotional moments. Ms. Banes' grande dame of the theatre works better. Ms. Mayberry's Charlotte probably comes across the best. Mr. Greenspan pulls out his Queen Elizabeth from last year's Orlando for Passalus' alter ego, an 80 year old neighbor woman. Mr. Bogardus, ever handsome, cruises along, but Mr. Hopper's Malcolm writhes morosely as the spurned lover.
Mr. Greenspan's script bounces around, alot ("Is there no chronology in this play?"). Throughout, each character takes their leave to speak inner thoughts and reactions in direct address. Director Leigh Silverman keeps things moving and navigates the odd focus and scenes shifts. Rachel Hauck's beach deck seems to surrealistically unfold into the sunset.
Go Back to Where You Are runs through May 1. Click here for tickets.
Showing posts with label David Greenspan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Greenspan. Show all posts
Monday, April 18, 2011
Monday, January 25, 2010
The Myopia, an epic burlesque of tragic proportions
"The Myopia, an epic burlesque of tragic proportions" Atlantic Theatre Stage 2, January 19, 2010
What is the dividing line between self-indulgence and masturbation?
David Greenspan's two-act monologue walks that line with occasional steps in either direction, weaving an existential web around a tale of his father's attempt to write a show based on the life of Warren Harding, tying in an allegory of his mother as a giant Rapunzel. His approach is reminiscent of Wallace Shawn, but doesn't approach the detailed imagery found in Mr. Shawn's work. Mr. Greenspan doesn't seem to dig quite that deeply. He is never less than theatrical.
His wordplay is intricate, best displayed in the opening sequence in which he discusses the difference between images on a stage and thinking of images on a stage. The latter may represent the former, but isn't actually the same. One can quickly draw that kind of comparison to his own writing. He recites these intermixed stories, playing all of the roles on the stage of a theatre, but does that make it an evening of theatre? When we listen to radio, the only pictures are in our heads. The same is here since he only paints the images in third-person with his words, gestures and postures. No real "happening" happens.
Director Brian Mertes adds to the apparent indulgence of the evening by keeping Mr. Greenspan seated for the entire performance, moving no more than his arms or body position in the chair. While this does allow a pinpoint focus on the performer, this static approach often lulls, particularly during the first act when combined with the din of Mr. Greenspan's pitched tenor voice. It's a lot to ask of an audience. Things do pick up in the second act as Carol Channing makes an appearance in the story to translate part of the tale. Maybe an earlier entrance for her would perk up the first act.
What is the dividing line between self-indulgence and masturbation?
David Greenspan's two-act monologue walks that line with occasional steps in either direction, weaving an existential web around a tale of his father's attempt to write a show based on the life of Warren Harding, tying in an allegory of his mother as a giant Rapunzel. His approach is reminiscent of Wallace Shawn, but doesn't approach the detailed imagery found in Mr. Shawn's work. Mr. Greenspan doesn't seem to dig quite that deeply. He is never less than theatrical.
His wordplay is intricate, best displayed in the opening sequence in which he discusses the difference between images on a stage and thinking of images on a stage. The latter may represent the former, but isn't actually the same. One can quickly draw that kind of comparison to his own writing. He recites these intermixed stories, playing all of the roles on the stage of a theatre, but does that make it an evening of theatre? When we listen to radio, the only pictures are in our heads. The same is here since he only paints the images in third-person with his words, gestures and postures. No real "happening" happens.
Director Brian Mertes adds to the apparent indulgence of the evening by keeping Mr. Greenspan seated for the entire performance, moving no more than his arms or body position in the chair. While this does allow a pinpoint focus on the performer, this static approach often lulls, particularly during the first act when combined with the din of Mr. Greenspan's pitched tenor voice. It's a lot to ask of an audience. Things do pick up in the second act as Carol Channing makes an appearance in the story to translate part of the tale. Maybe an earlier entrance for her would perk up the first act.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


